RoboCupHomeMap

NewsOverviewGames & ConferencesRegulations & RulesResearch & EducationResource & ReferenceCommunity

RoboCup-97 Nagoya


Simulation League Result



Group A
  • A1: Vicente Matellan, Universidad Carlos III De Madrid, Espana
  • A2: Peter Stone and Manuela Veloso, CMU, USA
  • A3: Simon Ch'ng, RMIT, Australia
  • A4: Tomohiro Ichimura, Kinki University, Japan
VS
Team 1
Team 2
Team 3
Team 4
Wins
/Defeat

Goal
Difference

# of Goals
Scored

Ranking
Team 1
-
1 - 9
10 - 0
0 - 8
1/2
-6
11
3
Team 2
9 - 1
-
16 - 0
6 - 5
3/0
9
15
1
Team 3
0 - 10
0 - 16
-
0 - 12
0/3
-22
0
4
Team 4
8 - 0
5 - 6
12 - 0
-
2/1
19
25
2


Group B
  • B1: Jukka Riekki, University of Oulu, Finland
  • B2: Peter Stone & Manuela Veloso, CMU, USA
  • B3: Paul Scerri, RMIT, Australia
  • B4: Takahiro Hotta, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Japan
VS
Team 1
Team 2
Team 3
Team 4
Wins
/Defeat

Goal
Difference

# of Goals
Scored

Ranking
Team 1
-
3 - 4
1 - 0
7 - 0
2/1
7
11
2
Team 2
4-3
-
13 - 0
20 - 0
3/0
34
37
1
Team 3
0 - 1
0 - 13
-
8 - 1
1/2
-7
8
3
Team 4
0 - 7
0 - 20
1 - 8
-
0/3
-34
1
4


Group C
  • C1: Alexis Drogoul & Dominique Duhaut, Universite PARIS 6, France
  • C2: Tucker Balch, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA
  • C3: Daiji Tamagawa, Aoyama Gakuin University, Japan
  • C4: Masayuki Ohta, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan
VS
Team 1
Team 2
Team 3
Team 4
Wins
/Defeat

Goal
Difference

# of Goals
Scored

Ranking
Team 1
-
7 - 1
7 - 9
7 - 14
1/2
-3
21
3
Team 2
1 - 7
-
2 - 11
0 - 15
0/3
-30
3
4
Team 3
9 - 7
11 - 2
-
1 - 20
2/1
-8
21
2
Team 4
14 - 7
15 - 0
20 - 1
-
3/0
41
49
1


Group D
  • D1: Hans-Dieter Burkhard, et al., Humboldt University, Germany
  • D2: Lyen Huang, Stanford University, USA
  • D3: Tomoo Inden, Chubu University, Japan
  • D4: Andhill Tomohito Andou, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan
VS
Team 1
Team 2
Team 3
Team 4
Wins
/Defeat

Goal
Difference

# of Goals
Scored

Ranking
Team 1
-
25 - 0
23 - 0
7 - 4
3/0
51
55
1
Team 2
0 - 25
-
1 - 4
0 - 23
0/3
-51
1
4
Team 3
0 - 23
4 - 1
-
0 - 23
1/2
-43
4
3
Team 4
4 - 7
23 - 0
23 - 0
-
2/1
43
50
2


Group E
  • E1: Enrico Pagello, The University of Padua, Italy
  • E2: (Canceled)
  • E3: Susumu Takagi, Chukyo University, Japan
  • E4: Akihiro Matsumoto & Hiromasa Nagai, Toyo University, Japan
VS
Team 1
Team 2
Team 3
Team 4
Wins
/Defeat

Goal
Difference

# of Goals
Scored

Ranking
Team 1
-
*
7 - 2
4 - 1
2/0
8
11
1
Team 2
*
-
*
*




Team 3
2 - 7
*
-
4 - 2
1/1
-3
6
2
Team 4
1 - 4
*
2 - 4
-
0/2
-5
3
3


Group F
  • F1: Yu Zhang and Alan Mackworth, University of British Columbia, Canada
  • F2: Sean Luke, University of Maryland, USA
  • F3: Koichi Ogawara, University of Tokyo, Japan
  • F4: Keiji Kanameda, Toyohashi Gijutsu Kagaku Daigaku, Japan
VS
Team 1
Team 2
Team 3
Team 4
Wins
/Defeat

Goal
Difference

# of Goals
Scored

Ranking
Team 1
-
2 - 5
1 - 7
9 - 0
1/2
0
12
3
Team 2
5 - 2
-
1 - 6
17 - 0
2/1
15
23
2
Team 3
7 - 1
6 - 1
-
18 - 0
3/0
29
31
1
Team 4
0 - 9
0 - 17
0 - 18
-
0/3
-44
0
4


Group G
  • G1: Jan Christensen, Charlmers University of Technology, Sweden
  • G2: (Canceled)
  • G3: Itsuki Noda, ETL, Japan
  • G4: Shougo Kosue, Kinki University, Japan
VS
Team 1
Team 2
Team 3
Team 4
Wins
/Defeat

Goal
Difference

# of Goals
Scored

Ranking
Team 1
-
*
9 - 0
2 - 10
1/1
1
11
2
Team 2
*
-
*
*




Team 3
0 - 9
*
-
0 - 16
0/2
-25
0
3
Team 4
10 - 2
*
16 - 0
-
2/0
24
26
1


Group H
  • H1: (Canceled)
  • H2: Milind Tambe, USC, USA
  • H3: Hideto Tomabechi, private entry, Japan
  • H4: Inoue & Wilkin, Waseda University, Japan
VS
Team 1
Team 2
Team 3
Team 4
Wins
/Defeat

Goal
Difference

# of Goals
Scored

Ranking
Team 1
-
*
*
*




Team 2
*
-
17 - 0
10 - 0
2/0
27
27
1
Team 3
*
0 - 17
-
4 - 0
1/1
-13
4
2
Team 4
*
0 - 10
0 - 4
-
0/2
-14
0
3



Second Stage

Second Stage



Final Ranking

World Champion
AT Humboldt (Humboldt Univ., Germany) Hans-Dieter Burkhard, Markus Hannebauer, et al.

Runner-Up
Andhill (Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan) ANDOU, Tomohito

3rd Place
ISIS (ISI/USC, USA) Milind Tambe et al

4th Place
CMUnited (CMU, USA) Peter Stone & Manuela Veloso


Characteristics of Winner
  • Humboldt uses Case-based reasoning and agent-oriented programming.
  • Andhill uses reinforcement learning.
  • ISIS uses an explicit model of teamwork, based on joint intentions.
  • CMUnited uses layered learning and a novel flexible teamwork structure.



Client Programs used in RoboCup-97
  • Humboldt(World Champion)
    Prof. Hans-Dieter Burkhard et al.,Humboldt University, Germany
  • AndHill(Runner-up)
    ANDOU Tomohito,Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan.
  • ISIS(3rd Place)
    Milind Tambe, Gal Kaminka, et al., USC/ISI, USA.
  • CMUnited(4th Place)
    Peter Stone and Manuela Veloso, CMU, USA.
    "CMUnited uses a hierarchical multiagent learning approach called Layered Learning, and a flexible teamwork structure for dynamic positioning."
  • RM Knights
    Simon Ch'ng, RMIT, Australia.
    Code is here.




[Back]

Copyright (C) 1998 The RoboCup Federation. All Rights Reserved.